Pool and Billiards Forums
Inside POOL magazine
pool and billiards forum
FAQ
chat
pool and billiards calendar
Pool and Billiards photos
pool and billiards games
Inside POOL Magazine store
Member Galleries

pol billiards
Go Back   Pool and Billiards Forums > Professional Pool Players > Sarah Ellerby

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-01-2007, 09:28 AM  
Member
Rep Power: 12354Sarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond repute
 

Default
All great feedback, thanks everyone. Now, what do you think to the short races to 7 in the TV stages of the event? What do you all want to see:

1. Longer races but with less features on the players, stats, etc
2. Same race to 7, with less games cut
3. Race to 7 with games cut but highlights of key shots that won that game, so more of the match

Sarah


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornerman View Post
I think that marketability plays very big role if the sport in question is going to expand their fan/viewer base. And with women sports, people smarter in marketing than we'll ever be embrace this idea. Women's golf is the most obvious analogy. They have full-time teams on the WPGA to address clothing that the players must wear.

Fred
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 10:58 AM  
Senior Member
Rep Power: 3158The Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond reputeThe Woim has a reputation beyond repute
 
The Woim's Avatar
 

Default
This is a good question. What's more important, playing skills or looks? For ESPN's purposes, only playing ability will get some new female cueist into the TV rounds Karen Corr or Allison Fisher.

First off, let me say that Sarah Ellerby is an exceedingly attractive woman. A beauty, even before she lost all that weight and became a hard body. Sarah's a real plus to the WPBA! My heart does melt...

Another statement I want to discuss and try to set straight is the misleading statement of "Sex Sells". No, I think that's an entirely inaccurate and false reductionist comment. I say reductionist because we're not just sexual beings, it's actually a pretty small portion of our lives. The statement "sex sells" is false because sex doesn't sell.

Whoa, what did The Woim just say?

It's beauty that sells, boys and girls. People pay to see beauty. If sex sells, then bulletin boards wouldn't bother paying premium dollar for beautiful models, they would save all that money and hire your frumpy neighborhood girl and just have her pose in a riske manner. They don't, because that doesn't sell.

It's beauty that sells, boys and girls. Pardon me for a few minutes while I expand on this correction. With porn, if just sex sells than ugly, nasty looking and foul women would be stars of porn where it's, once again, the really pretty women who are successful in porn. Sure, there are websites dedicated to "fat women" and "one legged women" but those women are attractive to the men who pay subscription to those sites. The saying is that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and that's what is in play with men going to oddity porn websites.

We pay premium dollar for beauty. A good looking car, a nice pool cue, a big and pretty house!

So, I just wanted to correct the "sex sells" nonsense. It's beauty that sells.

For a definition of beauty, see Sarah Ellerby's photo!

Yours Truly,
The Woim
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 08:44 AM  
Member
Rep Power: 12354Sarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond reputeSarah Ellerby has a reputation beyond repute
 

Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Woim View Post
This is a good question. What's more important, playing skills or looks? For ESPN's purposes, only playing ability will get some new female cueist into the TV rounds Karen Corr or Allison Fisher.

First off, let me say that Sarah Ellerby is an exceedingly attractive woman. A beauty, even before she lost all that weight and became a hard body. Sarah's a real plus to the WPBA! My heart does melt...

Another statement I want to discuss and try to set straight is the misleading statement of "Sex Sells". No, I think that's an entirely inaccurate and false reductionist comment. I say reductionist because we're not just sexual beings, it's actually a pretty small portion of our lives. The statement "sex sells" is false because sex doesn't sell.

Whoa, what did The Woim just say?

It's beauty that sells, boys and girls. People pay to see beauty. If sex sells, then bulletin boards wouldn't bother paying premium dollar for beautiful models, they would save all that money and hire your frumpy neighborhood girl and just have her pose in a riske manner. They don't, because that doesn't sell.

It's beauty that sells, boys and girls. Pardon me for a few minutes while I expand on this correction. With porn, if just sex sells than ugly, nasty looking and foul women would be stars of porn where it's, once again, the really pretty women who are successful in porn. Sure, there are websites dedicated to "fat women" and "one legged women" but those women are attractive to the men who pay subscription to those sites. The saying is that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and that's what is in play with men going to oddity porn websites.

We pay premium dollar for beauty. A good looking car, a nice pool cue, a big and pretty house!

So, I just wanted to correct the "sex sells" nonsense. It's beauty that sells.

For a definition of beauty, see Sarah Ellerby's photo!

Yours Truly,
The Woim
All great comments. I dislike the term "sex sells." I think it's tacky, I agree with beauty and attractive but talented, I think if you have these components you can be very successful in the sports world.

Thank you for your kind comments

Sarah
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Share on FacebookStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
All contents copyright of Inside POOL Magazine
Ad Management by RedTyger


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20