View Single Post
Old 11-01-2007, 12:15 PM  
JimBo
Senior Member
Rep Power: 122258JimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond reputeJimBo has a reputation beyond repute
 
JimBo's Avatar
 

Send a message via AIM to JimBo
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catscradle View Post
As a follow-up to this. I once heard it said by a famous mordern scuplture (can't remember his name, he did big outdoor things) that if a piece serves a function it is not art. That is, if a cue is used to play pool it is not art no matter how fancy, unique, or creative the design is. That is of course a debate that will continue forever within art circles.
If you did indeed say the above quote, does that idea contribute to your thinking?
In the true spirit of the JimBo section could you please tell us what cue you've made that you considered ugly and why. Also if you have any other cuemakers you'd like to point a finger at for making ugly cues I'd encourage it.


Jim <----Starting trouble again
__________________
To much power isn't good for a dumb dumb, welcome JimBo Army.